Bryan Reynolds

Software, Business, Life . . .

Contact

Bryan Reynolds
  Bryan Reynolds Linked In
E-mail me Send mail

Recent comments

Authors

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2008

Fraudulent Companies

Yesterday I got a frantic call from one of our clients. They were concerned that one of the marketing campaigns we manage through our lead system was not performing. They mentioned after looking at some reports they were concerned that this campaign had shut down. Leads were being submitted perfectly fine one day then not at all the next. They thought the system was broken. It was a valid question. I investigated.

During the conversation I looked at the reports myself and quickly realized that someone was messing with us. They were submitting leads at an almost 1 for 1 basis to visits. This was not the pattern we saw for any other lead campaign. 50 visits to a lead was more realistic. This campaign was not only performing at an almost 1 to 1 basis, but all leads were valid on entry. This is of course not realistic either. Normally we see a 5 to 1 ratio on a user submitting a lead and it passing all the validation checks to make sure it’s a real lead. This is not standard for everyone, I am sure. Depending on the validation logic your system has the numbers can be very different. Either way, this was a problem.

We are dealing with this now by adding preventative logic to the system.

Why do they do it? What can be done with people like this?

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Posted by Bryan on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 7:25 AM
Permalink | Comments (2) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

Related posts

Comments

Jeff Lynch us

Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:35 PM

Jeff Lynch

Bryan,

Unfortunately, there's not really anything you can do to prevent online fraud like you're seeing, unless the perpetrator is very sloppy. Most of these folks spoof someone else's IP address so even a reverse DNS lookup won't do much good. You can spend a lot of time and money trying to fight this type of activity, but I've found that in the end there is nothing to do except create some business logic that "filters" out unusual data from your campaign's database. I've done similar database "sanitizing" in the past and with the right logic, you should be able to filter out the junk data.

Jeff Lynch

Bryan us

Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:38 PM

Bryan

Jeff,

It turns out these guys were pretty sloppy. I can't get into the details too much, but after a little investigation we know exactly what they did and who they were. Now it's up to the lawyers. This particular case will go well for the client.

You are on the money with your suggestions. We have addressed the current issue.
Bryan

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

Friday, July 04, 2008 11:30 AM